| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd
''Pro Sieben Media v Carlton Television'' () 1 WLR 605 was a decision by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales over the fair dealing exception to United Kingdom copyright law. ProSieben had broadcast an interview on ''Taff'' with Mandy Allwood, a woman who was pregnant with octuplets. Carlton Television produced a current affairs program that used a 30 second extract from this interview, and had copied the entire program for the purposes of selecting the extract to be used. Pro Sieben Media sued Carlton, alleging copyright infringement, while Carlton argued that the use of the extract constituted fair dealing, as it was for the purposes of criticism or review, or for reporting current events.〔Aplin & Davis (2009) p.150〕
After losing in front of Laddie J in the High Court of Justice, Carlton appealed the decision to the Court of Appeal, where the case was heard by Walker, Henry and Nourse LJJ. In a decision written by Walker, and unanimously supported, the Court of Appeal confirmed that criticism or review as a concept did not just require criticism or review of the work being copied, but could also cover the social or moral implications of the work and ideas found within it.〔Bently & Sherman (2009) p.210〕 As such, the Carlton program, which was created to criticise chequebook journalism, could use the ''Taff'' extract and claim fair dealing as a valid defence.〔Aplin & Davis (2009) p.151〕
==References==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Pro Sieben Media AG v Carlton UK Television Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|